Net migration to UK higher than when coalition took office
Net flow of 298,000 long-term migrants to UK last year shatters PM’s ‘no ifs, no buts’ promise to cut number to ‘tens of thousands’ The new figures will be an embarrassment for David Cameron.
Net migration to Britain was 298,000 last year, shattering David Cameron’s “no ifs, no buts” promise to reduce it to the “tens of thousands” by the time of the general election, official figures show.
Publication of the latest set of quarterly migration figures means that the Conservatives will go into the election with the politically sensitive net migration figure 54,000 higher than when they made their pledge in 2010.
Instead of reducing net migration to Britain to below 100,000, the latest figures show that it is now almost 300,000, its highest level since 2005.
The Office for National Statistics said the rise was fuelled by increases in both immigration from outside the EU – 49,000 – which is subject to a complex visa regime – and an increase of 43,000 from within the EU, which is subject only to free movement rules.
The figures for the 12 months to September 2014 show that immigration rose from 530,000 the previous year to 624,000, while emigration remained stable at 327,000.
The Oxford University-based Migration Observatory said that Britain’s success in stimulating economic growth and job creation appeared to be a key factor undermining the government’s efforts to reduce net migration.
“If the UK’s economic performance compared to the rest of the EU had been poor, then we might well have seen net migration fall, but that has not happened. Rising work-related migration from outside the EU has also contributed,” said Madeleine Sumption, the Migration Observatory’s director.
The Conservatives’ net migration target was never endorsed by their Liberal Democrat coalition partners. The home secretary, Theresa May, has driven through repeated immigration squeezes on overseas students, family migration and on “benefit tourists” over the past five years.
The Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants said that to achieve the unrealistic target the government had been forced to put forward harsher and increasingly worrying policies that only served to create tensions among communities.
“Families are being torn apart, causing unnecessary additional heartache, migrant NHS staff, which we continue to recruit, are being unfairly treated, and international students are targeted as a result of arbitrary net migration figures,” said the JCWI.
Analysis The failure of David Cameron's migration policy has been spectacular
Analysis: PM promised to take migration below 100,000 but he goes into the election with figure at 300,000
The immigration minister, James Brokenshire, admitted that the figures were “clearly disappointing” and left much more to do. He said: “As we have said for some time, we have been blown off course by net migration from within the EU, which has more than doubled since 2010.
“That’s why we need to continue to crack down on the abuse of EU free movement and continue our reforms to make the welfare system fairer. We also need to make sure that people on time-limited visas, such as students, do leave at the end of their visa.”
Nick Clegg, the deputy prime minister, said the news was “very embarrassing for the Conservatives”, and added he had warned the prime minister against making the commitment.
“It was inevitable he was going to break it because you can’t control the net figure,” he told LBC Radio.
“I think it’s very embarrassing for the Conservatives. They made a huge amount of fanfare about it and they were warned. They were warned by me and others, privately: ‘Don’t do this, it doesn’t make any sense.’
“And now of course, I think they quite rightly will have to suffer the embarrassment having made a commitment on something which people care about passionately, which is immigration. They have made a commitment and they have failed spectacularly to deliver it.”
The prime minister’s deputy official spokesman denied allegations that Downing Street had used the publication of the Jimmy Savile report as a way of distracting from the immigration figures. “It’s clear that both issues are getting prominent coverage,” she said, while declining to say whether No 10 or the Department of Health was responsible for the timing.
The spokesman said Cameron found the figures “disappointing” but continues to stand by the government’s record on delivering action to reduce net migration. She said a large percentage of the rise can be attributed to EU citizens seeking work in the UK because of its attractive economic climate. Cameron’s efforts to deter new EU arrivals are focused on reducing benefits.
The detailed figures show that the largest element in the latest rise in immigration was in those coming to work, which rose 54,000 to 271,000. The numbers coming to study in Britain rose by 17,000 to 192,000 while those coming to join family in the UK rose by 14,000 to 90,000.
Of those coming to work in Britain 57% came from within the EU, 25% from outside Europe and the remainder were returning British citizens, the ONS figures show.
The detailed breakdown of EU nationals working in Britain shows that most of the increase came from western European countries and Romania and Bulgaria, while other eastern European numbers remained steady.
People in this conversation
Comments (2)
-
This is a great article, and having worked for the NHS for nearly 25 years, it makes me weep to see the stress that the system is under following the enactment of the Health and Social Care Act.
With an ageing population, we need more concentration on the care given to patients with long-term and chronic conditions, but these services are not cost-effective and therefore not of interest when the cherry-picking exercise starts.
Also, the current tariff system means that acute care - the care that you need when you have an accident, or a stroke, or a heart attack - is not cost-effective either. Acute hospitals are paid only a fraction of the cost of this care and have to find the remainder from the rest of their own budgets. This is unfair and unsustainable. A new government needs to take a long, hard look at the tariff system.
Intolerable pressure has been put on the NHS, particularly this winter, by the damage which has been done by cuts to social care. Emergency departments have filled up to overflowing while it has not been possible to discharge medically fit patients at the end of their acute pathway.
Why is this? Because someone in government has not realised that health and social care are inextricably linked. If you remove money from social care, it's like standing on the end of a hosepipe - and acute care gets the resulting explosion; sick patients stacking up in A&E departments, people on trollies, people waiting outside in ambulances as then they don't encroach on the dreaded waiting time statistics.
Health and social care desperately need some joined-up thinking after May 7th; we can't carry on like this as care is effectively being rationed. The consequences of "no travelling time" paid to a lot of care workers means that your loved ones are being short-changed by a system that is constantly trying to cut costs.
We are still the envy of the world - just - but we can't carry on like this. -
Dear Kym, everyone should have the right to be treated to care, whatever stage of life they are in. Please vote for the right candidate on https://www.commondecency.org.uk/may-7th-2015/2015-candidates-2
Leave your comments
Post comment as a guest